Global Compliance Policy
Effective date: February 17, 2026 | Version: 2026.02-global
This Global Compliance Policy defines the cross-functional control framework for legal, privacy, ad quality, security, and financial obligations across VelisAds Network.
Compliance is an operational system, not a one-time checklist; controls must be continuously measured and improved.
Scope and Applicability
- Applies to all teams building, operating, and supporting platform services.
- Applies to policy governance, control ownership, and release approval workflows.
- Applies to third-party onboarding and ongoing supplier oversight.
- Applies to audits, regulator responses, and partner due-diligence obligations.
- Applies to incident escalation, risk acceptance, and remediation governance.
- Applies to all operational regions served by VelisAds Network.
Mandatory Requirements
Governance and Accountability
- Each control domain must have named owners and defined escalation paths.
- Policies, procedures, and evidence expectations must be documented and versioned.
- Exceptions require risk rationale, compensating controls, and expiry dates.
- Executive review should cover material risk and remediation progress.
Risk and Control Operations
- Risk registers must track findings, impact, owner, and target closure date.
- Control testing cadence should match legal and business risk exposure.
- Corrective actions require measurable acceptance criteria before closure.
- Major incidents must produce root-cause analysis and systemic improvements.
Third-Party and Audit Readiness
- Vendors must pass due diligence before handling sensitive workloads.
- Contracts must include audit rights, breach duties, and data controls.
- Role-based compliance training is mandatory and completion tracked.
- Audit evidence must be retrievable, consistent, and time-bound.
Prohibited Practices
- Operating high-risk controls without assigned accountable owners.
- Approving exceptions without risk analysis or defined expiry.
- Suppressing or delaying critical audit findings without justification.
- Onboarding vendors without mandatory compliance due diligence.
- Falsifying evidence, certification claims, or control status records.
- Deploying high-risk features without required cross-functional sign-off.
- Ignoring regional legal obligations in active business markets.
- Retaliating against good-faith compliance concern reporting.
Governance, Monitoring, and Enforcement
- Compliance steering reviews control health, trends, and unresolved risks.
- Critical findings are escalated with mandatory remediation deadlines.
- Whistleblower and incident channels must support confidential reporting.
- Release gates require legal, security, and privacy confirmation for high-risk changes.
- Regulatory change tracking must map directly to control updates.
- External audit preparation includes completeness and traceability checks.
- Recurring violations may trigger feature restrictions or account action.
- Policies are reviewed at least annually or after major regulatory change.